A new addition has strengthened the telecommunications capabilities available to litigators working with Sidespin Group. A highly accomplished Wi-Fi expert witness and telecommunications expert witness has joined our roster, bringing decades of research, standards development, and expert testimony experience across wireless, software-defined radio, and broadband technologies.This expert is widely known in patent litigation circles for deep technical fluency, consistent credibility under deposition, and substantial familiarity with the procedural demands of both district court and PTAB matters. Their background now expands the range of software expert witness and wireless communications analysis available to clients handling disputes involving cellular standards, Wi-Fi technologies, network architecture, and signal processing.
Software Expert Witness, Artificial Intelligence Expert Witness, Cloud Computing Expert Witness, Cybersecurity Expert Witness, Database Expert Witness, High Performance Computing, Image Processing Expert Witness, Internet Expert Witness, Networking Software Expert Witness, Smartphone Expert Witness, Software Breach of Contract Expert Witness, Software Copyright Expert Witness, Software Development Expert Witness, Software IPR Expert Witness, Software Patent Infringement Expert Witness, Software Project Failure Expert Witness, Software Trade Secret Expert Witness, Source Code Review Expert Witness
Patent litigation involving software demands strategic precision, particularly in timing the engagement of a software expert witness. These professionals dissect...
Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly attractive to attorneys facing time pressures and high client expectations. Drafting briefs, motions,...
In the world of software litigation, very few disputes are as deceptively complex as determining whether one program is “substantially similar” to another. Unlike plagiarism in prose, where copied sentences often betray the act, software is written in ways that make verbatim copying unnecessary. A developer may use different variable names, restructure functions, or change comments, while still replicating the heart of another’s work. Courts have developed the concept of substantial similarity to address these situations, looking beyond literal line-by-line matches to evaluate whether the expression of ideas in code has been misappropriated.
A recent class-action lawsuit against GitHub, Microsoft, and OpenAI has brought significant attention to the legal challenges surrounding AI-generated code,...
Databases are critical in today’s technology-driven world, and understanding them is essential for legal professionals involved in cases requiring a...
Location evidence can place a device near a scene, reconstruct movements, or test an alibi. Courts expect clear methodology, reproducibility,...
Technical due diligence is a part of several types of high-stakes transactions involving technology companies. Other types of diligence include...
Talent markets shifted hard in 2022. Project management and organizational design climbed, while demand for advanced technical specialties—especially AI and...
The DMCA’s safe harbors were designed to protect internet operations while preserving copyright enforcement. The text of 17 U.S.C. §512...
Genetic programming (GP) has matured from academic curiosity to an applied engine for optimization and design across healthcare, automotive, finance,...
Contributory copyright infringement occurs when a party knowingly induces, causes, or materially contributes to another’s infringing conduct. This legal concept...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping transportation through advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), which enhance vehicle safety and pave the way for...
Car infotainment systems are redefining the automotive industry, blending advanced software, connectivity, and user interfaces to create immersive in-car experiences....