A new addition has strengthened the telecommunications capabilities available to litigators working with Sidespin Group. A highly accomplished Wi-Fi expert witness and telecommunications expert witness has joined our roster, bringing decades of research, standards development, and expert testimony experience across wireless, software-defined radio, and broadband technologies.This expert is widely known in patent litigation circles for deep technical fluency, consistent credibility under deposition, and substantial familiarity with the procedural demands of both district court and PTAB matters. Their background now expands the range of software expert witness and wireless communications analysis available to clients handling disputes involving cellular standards, Wi-Fi technologies, network architecture, and signal processing.
Software Expert Witness, Artificial Intelligence Expert Witness, Cloud Computing Expert Witness, Cybersecurity Expert Witness, Database Expert Witness, High Performance Computing, Image Processing Expert Witness, Internet Expert Witness, Networking Software Expert Witness, Smartphone Expert Witness, Software Breach of Contract Expert Witness, Software Copyright Expert Witness, Software Development Expert Witness, Software IPR Expert Witness, Software Patent Infringement Expert Witness, Software Project Failure Expert Witness, Software Trade Secret Expert Witness, Source Code Review Expert Witness
Patent litigation involving software demands strategic precision, particularly in timing the engagement of a software expert witness. These professionals dissect...
Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly attractive to attorneys facing time pressures and high client expectations. Drafting briefs, motions,...
In the world of software litigation, very few disputes are as deceptively complex as determining whether one program is “substantially similar” to another. Unlike plagiarism in prose, where copied sentences often betray the act, software is written in ways that make verbatim copying unnecessary. A developer may use different variable names, restructure functions, or change comments, while still replicating the heart of another’s work. Courts have developed the concept of substantial similarity to address these situations, looking beyond literal line-by-line matches to evaluate whether the expression of ideas in code has been misappropriated.
Listen to Sidespin Group founder and CEO Dr. Istvan Jonyer in a podcast episode to learn tips for experts new...
The technology strategy paradox presents a critical challenge in the fast-paced world of software development. This paradox reflects the tension...
Small businesses can gain a competitive edge by leveraging large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and other chatbots. These powerful...
The cryptocurrency industry has seen explosive growth, but with it comes a surge in legal challenges. Cryptocurrency lawsuits are becoming...
As consumer AI tools like ChatGPT gain popularity, concerns about bias in machine learning (ML) are growing. These biases can...
Generative AI is transforming how we create content, from images to code. Tools like Stable Diffusion, developed by Stability AI,...
The rise of AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT from OpenAI, has sparked significant interest across industries. These conversational tools, powered...
A recent class-action lawsuit against GitHub, Microsoft, and OpenAI has brought significant attention to the legal challenges surrounding AI-generated code,...
Databases are critical in today’s technology-driven world, and understanding them is essential for legal professionals involved in cases requiring a...
Location evidence can place a device near a scene, reconstruct movements, or test an alibi. Courts expect clear methodology, reproducibility,...