In complex technology litigation, expert analysis can be a valuable tool for clarifying technical details and supporting legal arguments. In the case of Collision Communications vs. Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, an expert report from Sidespin Group contributed to a broader legal strategy that ultimately resulted in a $20 million jury verdict.
Background: Dispute Over Uplink CoMP Technology
The dispute focused on Collision Communications’ proprietary Uplink Coordinated Multi-Point (UL CoMP) technology for LTE networks. UL CoMP addresses cellular interference, a challenge that grows with increased network density in urban environments. Collision’s solution aimed to improve uplink performance by reducing signal interference using advanced signal processing.
The litigation required close examination of the UL CoMP technology—its development process, implementation quality, and potential value—as Collision alleged a breach of contractual obligations by Nokia.
Technical Expert’s Role
Sidespin Group was engaged to provide a technical assessment of the software development work performed by Collision Communications. The expert’s report evaluated source code, version control history, time logs, and related documentation to help clarify the scope and quality of the work completed.
The analysis found that the development followed standard industry practices and that the work was well-documented and substantially complete when the engagement was halted. These findings supported the legal team’s broader argument regarding the value of the work delivered.
Importantly, this analysis was just one component in a multi-pronged legal strategy. It contributed technical context that, when combined with legal arguments and other evidence, helped build a compelling narrative for the jury.
Verdict and Implications
The jury ultimately awarded Collision Communications $20 million in damages. While many factors contributed to the outcome—including witness testimony, legal strategy, and factual evidence—the expert report played a supporting role by helping the court understand the technical dimensions of the dispute.
This case underscores the importance of well-supported, objective technical analysis in IP and contract litigation, especially where complex software systems are involved.
About Sidespin Group
Sidespin Group provides expert witness services in software-related litigation. Founded by Dr. Istvan Jonyer, the firm brings experience in software engineering, machine learning, and telecommunications to its consulting work. Dr. Jonyer has worked in both technical and business roles at companies such as Google and Nortel and has served as a researcher and venture investor.
Sidespin Group offers analysis in areas including:
- Patent disputes and IPR
- Trade secret misappropriation
- Software development and breach of contract claims
- Source code review and technical diligence
For more information, visit sidespingroup.com.
No tags for this post.
