Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly attractive to attorneys facing time pressures and high client expectations. Drafting briefs, motions, or discovery responses can be faster when supported by a generative AI system. But in recent months, courts have penalized attorneys who relied on AI-generated content without proper vetting. A New York federal court fined lawyers who filed a brief containing fabricated case citations, and more recently, a California attorney was sanctioned for filing a response with false authorities generated by ChatGPT CalMatters report.
In the world of software litigation, very few disputes are as deceptively complex as determining whether one program is “substantially...
AI agents are reshaping the legal profession, offering attorneys powerful tools to streamline workflows, enhance decision-making, and improve client outcomes....
In complex technology litigation, expert analysis by a software expert witness can be a valuable tool for clarifying technical details and supporting legal arguments. In the case of Collision Communications vs. Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, an expert report from Sidespin Group contributed to a broader legal strategy that ultimately resulted in a $20 million jury verdict.
Contributory copyright infringement occurs when a party knowingly induces, causes, or materially contributes to another’s infringing conduct. This legal concept...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping transportation through advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), which enhance vehicle safety and pave the way for...